In recent months, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun to issue consent decrees reflecting enforcement action against power utilities under a 2015 rule that established national standards for how coal-fired power plants should dispose of coal ash. Proactive steps now may help facilities avoid a fine similar to those cited in the recent consent decrees.
The Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) rule includes provisions for groundwater monitoring of existing and new CCR landfills and impoundments. EPA actions have included fines and requirements for compliance measures and appear to have been based upon a review of facilities’ published reports on required CCR websites, as well as subsequent information requests from the EPA. The rule was intended to be self-implementing, but some facilities’ compliance decisions are now being questioned by the EPA.
Items specifically identified by the EPA as non-compliant have included determinations that a CCR unit did not require monitoring under the rule, the number and spacing of monitoring wells, alternative source demonstrations, intrawell statistical limits, dry wells, and interference from other CCR sources. Barr recommends that clients falling under this rule review their past reports and, in particular, prior groundwater monitoring decisions, to assess whether preemptive actions now may avoid future EPA enforcement action. Barr can help review your facility’s CCR monitoring program to identify potential specific actions to maintain or achieve compliance. A cold-eye review such as this is often beneficial when compliance with complex regulations is critical.
Contact our team to learn more about Barr's environmental compliance support services.
Nick Palatiello focuses on market and strategy development for the power and manufacturing sectors and works with clients in a variety of capacities, from developing strategies for addressing PFAS to constructing solar facilities on brownfield sites. Nick works closely with clients to understand market and regulatory drivers and help them solve complex issues related to emerging contaminants and energy developments.
Civil designs create homes for the holidays
Designing Africa's first potash processing facility
Q&A: Are mussels impeding your underwater project?
EPA begins enforcement of coal-ash disposal rule
Floodplain management expert joins Barr
From our CEO
Receive the latest editions right to your inbox and explore industry trends, projects, and company news.
New EPA standards for oil and natural gas storage tank venting systems
New wastewater discharge standards for coal-fired power plants
EPA finalizes GHG standards for electric power generation industry
Certain PFAS now designated as hazardous substances under CERCLA
EPA releases maximum contaminant levels for PFAS in drinking water
Navigating the storm: Effectively managing industrial stormwater
New PFAS reporting requirements under TSCA
Stack test method OTM-50 announced to measure PFAS in air emissions
How will changes to the TRI/PFAS reporting rule affect your facility?
EPA program connects partners for sediment restoration
The evolution of PFAS analytical methods over the last decade
Balancing power generation with air quality compliance
Wind turbine foundations now and in the future
Using waste heat recovery for carbon management
Navigating CCR compliance under recent EPA determinations
EPA proposes rule to reduce ethylene oxide emissions from commercial sterilizers
How will the new PFAS MCLs affect NPDES permits?
Time to repower your wind energy site?
Foundation assessment a critical first step for wind repowering
EPA proposes maximum contaminant levels for six PFAS in drinking water
Minnesota DNR releases new commercial solar siting guidance
Domestic uranium production on the rise
EPA's latest proposed rule eliminates PFAS reporting exemption
The Inflation Reduction Act: Power focus